Minnesota Vikings DST
Defenses · MIN

Minnesota Vikings DST

TARGET Rank DST4 · #64 overall Conf medium ADP 135.4 Proj 105/136/168 Risk medium
AvoidFadeHoldTargetMust
blitz-heavyzone-heavyflores-yr4positive-regressionedge-turnoverrough-openweek6-bye
Quick hits
Your take

Sign in with Google to rate and tag this player — private to you.

Minnesota Vikings DST — 2026 evaluation

Verdict

TARGET (medium confidence) at ADP 135.4 (FFC PPR, 2026-07-07) — DST8, costing a round-12 dart (Dalton Kincaid 134.9 / Rashid Shaheed 132.6 / Tre Tucker 137.7 / Woody Marks 137.8). The market's case is fair: Minnesota lost four defensive starters at once — edge Jonathan Greenard (traded to PHI, April 2026), DTs Jonathan Allen and Javon Hargrave (released), and S Harrison Smith (released, likely retiring) — replaced by day-1/2 rookies, and the unit opens vs Green Bay (implied 23.0) and at Chicago's No. 1 pass-blocking line. But the market is pricing the departed *names*, not the returning *rates*: 39 of 2025's 49 sacks return (Turner 8, Van Ginkel 7, Wilson 6.5, Redmond 6 — weekly.csv, pulled 2026-07-07), the pass rush was No. 1 in the NFL in PRWR (46%) with Greenard mostly injured, Flores is in year 4 of the same scheme, and 2025's luck ran *against* this unit — 26th in INTs (8, one year after leading the league with 24) and just 1 defensive TD + 0 return TDs against a 1.5–2.5 base rate. Why the market is wrong: it repriced MIN down to DST8 on visible personnel exodus and last year's takeaway line, when the stickiest signal (pressure) is league-best, 80% of the sack production returns, and the INT/TD variance points up — a top-3 pressure profile at a top-8 price with three premium matchups in weeks 3–5. Confidence is medium, not high, because the weeks 1–2 card is genuinely bad, the interior DL is rookies behind a foot-rehab R1, and a 46% blitz rate makes any bad week ugly.

Bull case

  • The stickiest signal is league-best and it returns. PRWR 46%, No. 1 in the NFL (ESPN, 2026-01-06); sack rate 9.32%, 3rd; EPA/play allowed 3rd — and 39 of 49 sacks came from players still on the roster (Turner 8, Van Ginkel 7, Wilson 6.5, Redmond 6). The Greenard "loss" already happened in-season 2025 (3 sacks, injured) and the unit's pressure rate *rose*. Flores year 4 = continuity green flag.
  • Positive regression the market never prices (dst.md §9, verbatim green flag). 26th in INTs (8) in an 81%-zone, 46%-blitz scheme that produced a league-leading 24 INTs in 2024; 1 defensive TD + 0 return TDs vs a 1.5–2.5 base rate; only ~526 opponent dropbacks faced — the Murray offense upgrade adds volume, leads, and pass-heavy opponent scripts all at once.
  • The price is a dart, the range isn't. DST8 at 135.4 costs Kincaid/Shaheed/Marks-tier bench picks, for a unit whose median projects DST4–8 and whose ceiling (2024-MIN-shaped INT bounce) is a top-3 DST you never have to stream.

Bear case

  • You're buying the two worst weeks first. Home vs GB (implied 23.0, PBWR 6th, Love 4.6% sack rate) then at CHI (PBWR 1st, Williams 4.1%) — per dst.md §4 the early schedule *is* the asset, and MIN's is back-loaded behind a week-6 bye. BAL at 154.6 offers a strictly better weeks 1–6 card 19 picks later, making MIN's early edge over replacement roughly zero.
  • Four starters left one defense in one offseason. Both starting DTs, the highest-paid edge, and the franchise safety — replaced by rookies, with the R1 (Banks) on his second left-foot fracture in a year and run-stop win rate already 20th (ESPN, 2026-01-06). Install drag on a rebuilt interior is exactly what a 46% blitz scheme can't hide, and blown weeks at that blitz rate are −1-bracket ugly.
  • The 2025 stat line flatters the sack and fumble columns. Same 49 sacks as 2024 on ~190 fewer dropbacks = an elevated pressure-to-sack conversion (~27% charting-scale) that regresses toward ~21–24%, and a league-max 14 fumble recoveries that are coin-flip luck. Median honestly re-based is ~45 sacks/~22 TO — good, not 2025's rate line.

Projection & comps

Bottom-up, standard DST scoring (assumed table above), 17 games:

ComponentFloor (p20)MedianCeiling (p80)Basis
Opp. dropbacks~570~600~6202025: ~526 (49 ÷ 9.32% — def_summary); 2024: ~714. Murray offense → more opponent passing than 2025's run-at-them script
Sack rate → sacks6.8% → 397.5% → 458.4% → 52Pressure elite (PRWR 46%, 1st — ESPN 2026-01-06) but 2025 conversion (~27% charting-scale) regressed toward ~21–24%; Greenard 2–4 pt haircut risk mostly pre-paid (he had 3 of 49 sacks)
Takeaways → pts18 → 3622 → 4427 → 542025: 22 (1.29/gm) regressed 50% toward 1.3/gm ≈ 22; mix shifts — 8 INT (26th) regresses up, 14 FR (1st) regresses down; ceiling = partial 2024 INT bounce (24 INT)
Def/return TDs → pts1 → 62 → 123 → 18Base rate 1.5–2.5 per dst.md §1 (2025 actual: 1 def TD, 0 ST TD — weekly.csv)
PA/gm → bracket pts22.0 → ~2419.8 → ~3218.0 → ~422025: 19.59 (7th) *despite* a bottom-5 offense; Murray upgrade is direct bracket upside; floor = rookie-DL install + Murray bust
Safeties01 → 22 → 42025 actual: 1 (weekly.csv)
Season total~105 (6.2/gm)~136 (8.0/gm)~168 (9.9/gm)Floor ≈ DST14–18; median ≈ DST4–8; ceiling ≈ top-3

Games/startability risk: medium. Drivers: the weeks 1–2 slate (GB implied 23.0; CHI PBWR 1st) may force benching the pick immediately; R1 DL Caleb Banks is rehabbing a fractured left-foot metatarsal (second left-foot fracture within a year) with a camp return targeted (profootballrumors, June 2026; heavy.com, July 2026); Turner is now a single point of failure at edge with UDFA depth behind him and Van Ginkel entering his age-31 season (age UNVERIFIED from cache).

Comps (profile: established elite-pressure scheme, personnel churn, takeaway-neutral):

Signal core (dst.md §2)

Metric20242025Band / read
Pressure rate31.8% (charted, n=779)34.1% (charted, n=552) — nflverse participation, pulled 2026-07-07 (charting defn runs above PFR-scale; trust the trend: +2.3 pts YoY)Elite — and rose in the year Greenard was hurt
Sack rate6.86% (13th)9.32% (3rd) — def_summary, nflverse, pulled 2026-07-07Elite — same 49 sacks both years on far fewer 2025 dropbacks
PRWR (ESPN)UNVERIFIED46% — 1st in NFL (ESPN win rates, 2026-01-06)Elite — isolates rush talent from the blitz volume
Pressure→sack conversion~21.6% implied (charting-scale)~27.3% implied (9.32 ÷ 34.1; definitional caveat)Elevated → regress down toward ~21–24%; the sack-rate number, not the pressure number, is the part to fade
Takeaways/gm1.94 (33: 24 INT / 9 FR) — 1st1.29 (22: 8 INT / 14 FR) — 10thRegressed projection ≈ 1.3/gm; INT (26th) up, FR (1st, league-max 14) down — net wash with upside mix
Blitz rate (5+ rushers)40.1%46.2% (6+: 15.0%) — nflverse participation chartingNFL-extreme → weekly boom/bust variance flag; PRWR 1st says the pressure is not purely blitz-manufactured
Man/zone33.6 / 66.419.0 / 81.0 zone (n=553)Zone-heavy behind pressure — INT-friendly structure (see 2024)
Opp. implied PPG, wks 1–423.0 (GB, DK opener 2026-05-14) / ~23 est. / ~22 est. / ~16.5–17.5 est. (from win totals, DK via FOX, May 2026)Mixed, back-loaded — avg ≈ 21; weeks 1–2 are the concern band, weeks 3–5 premium
Base-rate xFP~136 std pts ≈ DST4–8Top-5 range vs a DST8 price
EPA/play allowed−0.089 (2nd)−0.086 (3rd) — def_summaryElite two years running

2×2 read: 2025 was high sacks on high pressure — not the sell cell (that's high sacks on *average* pressure), but the conversion component is elevated and regresses, so project ~45 sacks, not 49+. The genuinely mispriced cells are the INT column (26th, in an 81% zone / 46% blitz scheme that led the NFL in INTs the year before) and the TD line (1 total vs a 1.5–2.5 base rate) — the classic elite-pressure + bottom-quartile-luck green flag (dst.md §9).

Context (team profile: data/team-profiles/MIN.md, 2026-07-07)

Early-season streaming picture (weeks 1–6) — handoff for /weekly-edge

WkOppVenueOpp impliedOpp PBWR (2025 final, ESPN 2026-01-06)QB (2025 sack rate — passing.csv)Read
1GBHome23.0 (GB −1.5, O/U 44.5 — DK opener, 2026-05-14)6th (69%)Love, 4.6%Below streaming bar (>20); startable only on home + pressure-profile grounds
2@CHIRoad~23 est. (CHI 9.5 wins — DK via FOX, May 2026)1st (74%)C. Williams, 4.1%Avoid — worst matchup of the season on paper
3@TBRoad~22 est. (TB 8.5 wins)15th (64%)Mayfield, 6.2%, 11 INTNeutral — playable, not a target
4MIAHome~16.5–17.5 est. (MIA 4.5 wins — DK via FOX, May 2026)24th (59%)Malik Willis — first-year full starter, 6 career starts, new regime (ESPN, 2026)Premium — checks every streaming criterion
5@NORoad~20–21 est. (NO 7.5 wins)29th (56%)Shough, 8.7%Strong — bottom-3 OL + top sack-rate QB
6BYEStreamer required regardless

Likely-available alternatives that beat MIN early (streaming criteria, dst.md §8): BAL (ADP 154.6) — favored in all of its first six games, hosts the two highest sack-rate young QBs in weeks 2/4 (fantasylife.com, 2026; see baltimore-ravens-dst.md — TARGET) and beats MIN outright in weeks 1–2; LAC (161.5) — Brissett/Cousins matchups early (fantasylife.com, 2026); KC (outside top-16 DST ADP) — Colts/Dolphins/Raiders in weeks 2–4 (fantasylife.com, 2026). Draft-room rule: MIN is the better season-long unit, BAL is the better week-1-through-6 card at a cheaper price — take whichever falls, and if drafting MIN, pre-plan a week-2 (and possibly week-1) pivot plus the week-6 bye fill.

Tripwires

Sources
  • data/stats/2025/def_summary.csv, data/stats/2024/def_summary.csv — nflverse via nflreadpy, pulled 2026-07-07 (sacks, sack rate, INT/FR/takeaways, PA/gm, EPA/play allowed, league ranks/means)
  • data/stats/2025|2024/participation.csv — nflverse, pulled 2026-07-07 (charted pressure rate, blitz rate 5+/6+, man/zone splits; charted-dropback filter = plays with pass rushers recorded)
  • data/stats/2025|2024/weekly.csv — nflverse, pulled 2026-07-07 (MIN player sack attribution, def TDs 1/2, ST TDs 0/0, safeties 1/3)
  • data/stats/2025/passing.csv — nflverse, pulled 2026-07-07 (opposing QB 2025 sack rates: Love 4.6%, C. Williams 4.1%, Mayfield 6.2%, Willis 7.9% n=35, Shough 8.7%)
  • data/adp/adp_ffc_2026-07-07.csv — FFC PPR mocks, 2026-07-07 (MIN DST 135.4 = DST8; skill players 125–148; DST board SEA 98.2 → BAL 154.6)
  • data/team-profiles/MIN.md — built 2026-07-07 (Flores retention, personnel ins/outs, blitz/man-zone/pressure table, own-offense read, win total 8.5 DK via CBS Sports 2026-07-01)
  • ESPN win rates final 2025 (2026-01-06): MIN PRWR 46% (1st); PBWR — CHI 1st 74%, GB 6th 69%, TB 15th 64%, MIA 24th 59%, NO 29th 56%
  • CBS Minnesota (May 2026): MIN 2026 schedule wks 1–8 (GB, @CHI, @TB, MIA, @NO, BYE, IND, @DET); confirmed vs vikings.com/NFL.com schedule pages
  • DraftKings Network (2026-05-14): Week 1 opener GB −1.5 at MIN, O/U 44.5 → GB implied ≈ 23.0
  • FOX Sports 2026 win totals (DraftKings, ~May 2026): GB 10.5, CHI 9.5, TB 8.5, MIA 4.5, NO 7.5 — opponent implied totals wks 2–5 are estimates from these, marked est.
  • ESPN (2026): Dolphins sign Malik Willis 3yr/$67.5M as starter; Tua released ($99M dead cap) → ATL — Miami full new regime (GM Sullivan, HC Hafley)
  • vikings.com/NFL.com/CBS (April 2026): Greenard + #244 → PHI for 2026 R3 #98 + 2027 R3; vikingsterritory (2026): trade criticism, Turner "underrated" (8 sacks / 288 pass-rush snaps, 15 QB hits, 11 TFL, 4 FF)
  • profootballrumors (June 2026) / heavy.com / Newsweek (July 2026): Banks fractured 4th metatarsal (left foot), spring surgery, camp return targeted, Week 1 start planned
  • heavy.com (2026-06-29, citing Purple Insider/Matthew Coller): Leonard Floyd predicted as veteran edge add — unsigned as of 2026-07-07
  • fantasylife.com "4 DST Streamers To Target for 2026" (2026): BAL favored in first six games; LAC early Brissett/Cousins matchups; KC wks 2–4 — streaming alternatives
  • UNVERIFIED: 2024 MIN PRWR value; PFR-definition pressure rates (PFR page 403'd per team profile); Van Ginkel exact age; opponent implied totals wks 2–5 (estimates from win totals, no early lines found)